Astronomical School’s Report, 2004, Volume 5, Issue 1-2, Pages 177–184

https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-6602.05.1177
Download PDF
UDC UDC 523.6

Physical properties of comet 81P Wild 2

Pittichová J.1, 2, Meech K.J.1

1Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
2Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Abstract

81P/Wild 2 is the STARDUST space mission target. This comet was selected because of its newness as a Jupiter family comet and because of the discovery of a trajectory offering a low encounter velocity of only 6.1 km·s−1. Observations over a wide range of heliocentric distances since 1987 have enable us the greatly enhance our knowledge of 81P/Wild 2, as required to mount a successful space mission. We want to present four sets of observations of comet 81P/Wild 2 which were made in order to search for rotational period of the nucleus during November 11–12, 1996, June 26–28, 1998, September 26–28, 1998 and August 12–17, 1999 using the University of Hawaii 2.2 m telescope. At the time of the observations, the comet was at heliocentric distances, r = 2.28, 3.61, 4.01 and 4.98 AU. The comet was active for all runs, and during 1996 November the coma extended >100″ (1.65×10 5 km at the distance of the comet) at PA≈262°, and during 1998 June the coma extended >51″ (1.34×105 km at the distance of the comet) at PA≈254°, and during 1998 September the coma extended >12″ (3.50×105 km at the distance of the comet) at PA≈125°, and during 1999 August the coma extended >8″ (2.90×104 km at the distance of the comet) at PA≈203°. Using a phase-dispersion minimization technique, we will try to find a possible rotation period.

Keywords:

References

  1. A’Hearn M.F., Millis R.L. Abundance correlations among comets, Astron. J, 1980, 85, P. 1528. https://doi.org/10.1086/112830
  2. Fink U., Hicks M.D., Fevig R.A. Production Rates for the Stardust Mission Target: 81P/Wild 2, Icarus, 1999, 141, P. 331. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1999.6182
  3. Gibson J. Periodic Comet Wild 2 (1983s), IAU Circular, 1983, No 3867.
  4. Landolt A.U. UBVRI photometric standard stars around the celestial equator, Astron. J, 1983, 88, P. 439. https://doi.org/10.1086/113329
  5. Landolt A.U. UBVRI photometric standards stars in the magnitude range 11.5 < V < 16.0 around the celestial equator, Astron. J, 1992, 104, P. 340. https://doi.org/10.1086/116242
  6. Meech K.J., Newburn Jr.R.L. Observations and Modelling of 81P/Wild 2, Icarus, 2002.
  7. Meech K.J., Bauer J.M., Hainaut O.R. Rotation of comet 46P/Wirtanen, Astron. Astrophys, 1997, 326, P. 1268.
  8. Meech K.J., Jewitt D.C. Observations of comet P/Halley at minimum phase angle, Astron. Astrophys, 1987, 187, P. 585.
  9. Osip D.J., Schleicher D.G., Millis R.L. Comets — Groundbased observations of spacecraft mission candidates, Icarus, 1992, 98, P. 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(92)90212-p
  10. Sanzovo G.C., Singh P.D., Huebner W.F. Dust colors, dust release rates, and dust-to-gas ratios in the comae of six comets, Astron. Astrophys, 1996, 120, P. 301.
  11. Sanzovo G.C., et al. Mass-loss rates, dust particle sizes, nuclear active areas and minimum nuclear radii of target comets for mission STARDUST and CONTOUR, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, 2001, 326, P. 852. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04443.x
  12. Stellingwerf R.F. Period determination using phase dispersion minimization, Astrophys. J, 1978, 224, P. 953. https://doi.org/10.1086/156444
  13. Torres M.R. PhD thesis University of São Paulo, Brazil, 2001.
  14. Yen C.L., Hirst E.A. STARDUST mission design, AAS 97–707, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Sun Valley, Idaho, Aug. 4–7, 1997.
  15. Wild P. Comet Wild (1978b), IAU Circular, 1978, No 3166.

Download PDF